Skip to content

Conversation

@oleonardolima
Copy link
Collaborator

@oleonardolima oleonardolima commented Jan 7, 2026

fixes #155

It bumps the version to 0.12.2 and also introduces the missing CHANGELOG file, as of this release we should keep track of the changes and update it on the CHANGELOG file.

@oleonardolima oleonardolima self-assigned this Jan 7, 2026
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 7, 2026

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 20900778026

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 86.704%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 20858034035: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1402
Relevant Lines: 1617

💛 - Coveralls

@oleonardolima oleonardolima marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2026 18:32
luisschwab

This comment was marked as outdated.

It didn't have a `CHANGELOG` file, as of `v0.12.2` we should now keep
track of the changes and it on the `CHANGELOG` file as we already do on
other projects.
@oleonardolima oleonardolima force-pushed the release/bump-version-to-0.12.2 branch from 1e3219d to 61c333d Compare January 9, 2026 17:49
@oleonardolima
Copy link
Collaborator Author

As #159 is now merged we can move forward with the release, I've now introduced the CHANGELOG file in: 61c333d

Copy link
Member

@luisschwab luisschwab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 61c333d

Good addition, we were missing a CHANGELOG.md here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ValuedMammal ValuedMammal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 61c333d

@luisschwab
Copy link
Member

LGTM, maybe squash the CHANGELOG commits?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chore(release): esplora-client v0.12.2

4 participants